Preface

The January 17, 1995, Hyogoken-Nanbu Earthquake was one of the worst disasters to hit Japan in almost a half a century, and it has been compared in its impact to the great Kanto (Tokyo) Earthquake of 1923 (AIJ, 1995). Immediately following the earthquake it became apparent that the Kobe-Osaka region held many similarities in its geologic and tectonic setting to many areas along the West Coast and, possibly, other areas of the United States. Therefore, a geotechnical reconnaissance to identify the relevant problems and issues was organized under the auspices of the Siting and Geotechnical Systems Earthquake Hazard Mitigation Program of the Engineering Directorate of the National Science Foundation. The mission of the reconnaissance team was to provide a timely, first-hand overview of the type and extent of the geotechnical aspects of the damage, and to provide the necessary background information for future research and for US-Japan cooperation in geotechnical earthquake engineering. The assembled team consisted of the following individuals:

Jonathan D. Bray - University of California, Berkeley
Ross W. Boulanger - University of California, Davis
John T. Christian - Consulting Engineer, Boston, MA
W.D. Liam Finn - University of British Columbia (also on the Canadian team)
Leslie F. Harder, Jr. - Calif. Dept. of Water Resources, Sacramento, CA
Izzat M. Idriss - University of California, Davis
James K. Mitchell - Virginia Polytechnic Institute
Yoshiharu Moriwaki - Woodward-Clyde Consultants, Inc., Santa Ana, CA
Thomas D. O'Rourke - Cornell University
Raymond B. Seed - University of California, Berkeley
Nicholas Sitar - University of California, Berkeley
Kenichi Soga - Cambridge University, U.K.
T. Leslie Youd - Brigham Young University

The reconnaissance team's visit was officially sponsored by the Japanese Society of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, and the Japanese hosts were led by Professor Koichi Akai, Professor Emeritus of the Kyoto University, Professor Kenji Ishihara of the University of Tokyo, Professor Koichi Nakagawa of the Osaka City University, and Dr. Yoshinori T. Iwasaki, Director of the Geo-Research Institute in Kobe.

Due to the extensive disruption to the transportation network, the investigation within Kobe was performed principally on foot, the port facilities were inspected by boat and on foot, and a couple of helicopter overflights were made. Thus, while effort has been made to provide a balanced overview, the limited ground time, on the order of less than a week for the U.S. members of the team, necessarily limits the scope and substance of this report. Consequently, the observations and opinions presented here are intended to serve as a guidance to further in depth assessment and not as a final, definitive evaluation of the specific events and phenomena.

A combination of several factors contributed significantly to the severity of much of the damage: the area had been previously considered to have relatively low seismic risk, the projected location of the release of energy along the earthquake fault was almost immediately below a densely developed urban area, and the geologic setting of the region, on the shores of a large embayment, provided for a substantial thickness and areal distribution of soft and liquefiable sediments. The principal geotechnical aspects of the Hyogoken-Nanbu Earthquake include the following:

Overall, the area affected by the 1995 Hyogoken-Nanbu Earthquake has many similarities, in terms of geologic setting and the level of development to other locations around the world, the San Francisco Bay area and the Los Angeles basin, for example. Therefore, much can be learned about the type and the extent of damage that can occur when a major fault ruptures through an urban environment. In this context, the collective body of information gathered following the October 17, 1989, Loma Prieta Earthquake, the January 17, 1994, Northridge Earthquake, and now the Hyogoken-Nanbu Earthquake should serve to provide important lessons for engineering professionals, researchers, government officials, and the public, alike. More importantly, we hope that this, and other reports which will follow, will help in providing the inspiration and guidance in developing strategies to minimize the extent of avoidable damage in future earthquakes, at least in the well-known seismically active regions.


Acknowledgements
Table of Contents